Mill’s extraordinary utilitarian moral theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy.
Psychopathic behavior is characteristically amoral, but to date research studies have largely failed to identify any systematic differences in moral judgment capability between psychopaths and non-psychopaths. In this study, we investigate whether significant differences in moral judgment emerge when taking into account the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disorder through a well-validated disti...
متن کاملMoral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain.
The investigation of the neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying the moral mind is of paramount importance for understanding complex human behaviors, from altruism to antisocial acts. A new study on patients with prefrontal damage provides key insights on the neurobiology of moral judgment and raises new questions on the mechanisms by which reason and emotion contribute to moral cognition.
متن کاملWhy are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains.
Koenigs, Young and colleagues [1] recently tested patients with emotion-related damage in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) usingmoral dilemmas used in previous neuroimaging studies [2,3]. These patients made unusually utilitarian judgments (endorsing harmful actions that promote the greater good). My collaborators and I have proposed a dual-process theory of moral judgment [2,3] that ...
متن کاملSerotonin Transporter Genotype (5-HTTLPR) Predicts Utilitarian Moral Judgments
BACKGROUND The psychological and neurobiological processes underlying moral judgment have been the focus of extensive recent research. Here we show that serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype predicts responses to moral dilemmas featuring foreseen harm to an innocent. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Participants in this study judged the acceptability of actions that would unintentionally or...
متن کاملFor the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment.
People often judge it unacceptable to directly harm a person, even when this is necessary to produce an overall positive outcome, such as saving five other lives. We demonstrate that similar judgments arise when people consider damage to owned objects. In two experiments, participants considered dilemmas where saving five inanimate objects required destroying one. Participants judged this unacc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Politics, Philosophy & Economics
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1470-594X,1741-3060
DOI: 10.1177/1470594x09351952